Rajasthan High Court
CCP/227/2025 of MRS. NEELAM AGARWAL D/O SHRI NAWAL KISHORE AGARWAL, Vs SMT. GAYATRI RATHORE on 3 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 227/2025 CNR: RJHC020171792025 | URN: CCP / 242U / 2025 Mrs. Neelam Agarwal D/o Shri Nawal Kishore Agarwal, Aged About 40 Years, Village Post-Gangadwari, Teh. Sikrai, Distt. Dausa(Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Smt.
[2026:RJ-JP:30145]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 227/2025
CNR: RJHC020171792025 | URN: CCP / 242U / 2025
Mrs. Neelam Agarwal D/o Shri Nawal Kishore Agarwal, Aged About 40 Years, Village Post-Gangadwari, Teh. Sikrai, Distt.
Dausa(Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Smt. Gayatri Rathore, Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2.
Shri Rakesh Kumar Sharma-I, Director, (Non Ggazette)
Medical And Health Services Swasthaya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.).
3.
Shri Rakesh Kumar Gochar, Deputy Director, (Non Gazette) Medical And Health Services Swasthaya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.).
4.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Ashwinee Kumar Jaiman
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Sankalp Vijay for Mr. Vigyan Shah,
AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
03/08/2026 Mr. Sankalp Vijay, Advocate puts in appearance on behalf of the respondent No.4-State of Rajasthan. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present contempt petition has become infructuous.
[2026:RJ-JP:30145] (2 of 2) [CCP-227/2025] Accordingly, the present contempt petition is dismissed as having become infructuous as the respondents have complied with the orders. Contempt notices stand discharged. Pending application, if any, also stands discharged. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 93/Ashish Kumar