Rajasthan High Court
CCP/408/2026 of NARESH SAINI S/O SHRI KHAYALI RAM SAINI, Vs SHRI JITENDRA KUMAR SONI, on 3 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 408/2026 CNR: RJHC020231932026 | URN: CCP / 433U / 2026 Naresh Saini S/o Shri Khayali Ram Saini, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Kila Upar, Gram Paota, Tehsil Paota, District Kotputli. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Jitendra Kumar
[2026:RJ-JP:30234]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 408/2026
CNR: RJHC020231932026 | URN: CCP / 433U / 2026
Naresh Saini S/o Shri Khayali Ram Saini, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Kila Upar, Gram Paota, Tehsil Paota, District Kotputli.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Shri Jitendra Kumar Soni, Collector, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2.
Shri Lokendra Meena, Development Officer (Additional Charge), Panchayat Samiti Paota, District Kotputli-Behror.
3.
Shri Fateh Singh Meena, Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Paota, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.).
4.
Shri Sher Singh Luhadiya, Chief Executive Office, Office Of District Collectorate, Jaipur.
5.
State Of Rajasthan, Through The, Secretary, Urban Development And Local Self Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Naqvi Sehban
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Ashutosh Udawat for Mr. Kapil
Prakash Mathur, AAG
Mr. Surya Pratap
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
03/08/2026 The present contempt petition has been filed alleging non- compliance of the order dated 20.09.2025 passed by the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13061/2025. By the order dated 20.09.2025, the respondents were directed to decide the representation submitted by the petitioner
[2026:RJ-JP:30234] (2 of 2) [CCP-408/2026] expeditiously after affording due opportunity of hearing to all aggrieved persons. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the representation submitted by the petitioner has already been decided by the respondents-authorities vide order dated 09.07.2026. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also admits this fact that the representation submitted by the petitioner has already been decided by the respondents. In view of the above, the present contempt petition is disposed of. Contempt notices stand discharged. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to make challenge to the order of deciding the representation, if he feels aggrieved by it. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 97/Ashish Kumar