Rajasthan High Court
CCP/677/2025 of PINTU KUMAR MEENA S/O KAJOD MAL MEENA Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN, on 3 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 677/2025 CNR: RJHC020570362025 | URN: CCP / 721U / 2025 1. Pintu Kumar Meena S/o Kajod Mal Meena, Aged About 28 Years, Present Posted Govt. Senior Secondary School Mordha, District Kotputli-Behror 2. Rakesh Kumar Meena S/o
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 677/2025
CNR: RJHC020570362025 | URN: CCP / 721U / 2025
1.
Pintu Kumar Meena S/o Kajod Mal Meena, Aged About 28
Years, Present Posted Govt. Senior Secondary School Mordha, District Kotputli-Behror
2.
Rakesh Kumar Meena S/o Harphool Meena, Aged About 23 Years, Present Posted Government Senior Secondary School Buchara, Paota, District Kotputli-Behror
3.
Lokesh Kumar Mena S/o Ramphool Meena, Aged About 22
School, Bajrangpura, Viratnagar, District Kotputli-Behror
4.
Ram Khiladi Meena S/o Sharwan Lal Meena, Aged About 31 Years, Present Posted Government Senior Secondary School Churi, District Kotputli-Behror
5.
Rakesh Meena S/o Chhotu Lal Meena, Aged About 29
Years, Present Posted Government Primary School Buchara, Paota, District Kotputli-Behror
6.
Vijender Meena S/o Shivram Meena, Aged About 26
Years, Present Posted Government Senior Secondary
School Bhoori Bhadaj, Paota, District Kotputli-Behror
7.
Sunil Kumar Bairwa S/o Kailash Chand, Aged About 30
Years, Present Posted Government Girls Senior Secondary School Gyanpura Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror
8.
Gaurav Singh S/o Girraj Singh, Aged About 23 Years, Present Posted Government Senior Secondary School Bhuri Bhandaj, Paota, District Kotputli-Behror
9.
Vishnu Bairwa S/o Prabhu Dayal Bairwa, Aged About 23
School Lalpura, Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror
10.
Ramesh Kumar Bairwa S/o Banwari Lal Bairwa, Aged About 24 Years, Present Posted Government Senior Secondary School Shahid Vikram Singh Nagar, Paota, District Kotputli-Behror
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Additional Chief Secretary, School Education Department And Language
[2026:RJ-JP:30224]
(2 of 3)
[CCP-677/2025]
And Library Department And Panchayati Raj (Elementary Education) Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.
Shri Sita Ram Jat, The Director, Secondary Education Rajasthan, Bikaner
3.
Shri Sita Ram Jat, The Director, Elementary Education And Panchayati Raj (Elementary Education) Department, Rajasthan, Bikaner
4.
Shri Prakash Chand Meena, The District Education Officer, Headquarter Elementary Education, District Kotputli, Rajasthan
5.
Shri Krishn Kunal, The Additional Chief Secretary, School Education Department And Language And Library Department And Panchayati Raj (Elementary Education)
Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Ms. Srijana Shresth
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Vishal Kumar for Mr. Manoj
Sharma, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
03/08/2026 Mr. Vishal Kumar, Advocate puts in appearance on behalf of the respondents No.3 and 4. Hence, service upon the said respondents is complete. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents No.3 and 4 submits that the respondents have complied with the orders of the Court by deciding the representation of the petitioners with a reasoned and speaking order on 02.04.2026 which is placed on record as (Annexure-CPR/1).
(3 of 3) [CCP-677/2025] In view of deciding the representation of the petitioners vide order dated 02.04.2026, in opinion of this Court that the respondents have complied with the order dated 22.04.2025. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is disposed of. Contempt notices stand discharged. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to avail appropriate remedy available to them under law so as to challenge the order dated 02.04.2026, if they feel aggrieved by it. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 94/Ashish Kumar