Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/8363/2026 of SMT. SEEMA W/O AMAR SINGH Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 3 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8363/2026 CNR: RJHC020510172026 | URN: CRLMB / 15236U / 2026 Smt. Seema W/o Amar Singh, R/o Kailadevi, Police Station Kail- adevi, District Karauli (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8363/2026
CNR: RJHC020510172026 | URN: CRLMB / 15236U / 2026
Smt. Seema W/o Amar Singh, R/o Kailadevi, Police Station Kail- adevi, District Karauli (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Rajneesh Gupta with
Mr. Utkal Pandey
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP
Mr. Ram Avtar Meena, C.I.,
P.S. Kailadevi(Karauli)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
03/08/2026
1. The present bail application has been preferred by the accused-petitioner under Section 482 of BNSS 2023, apprehending his arrest in connection with the FIR No. 15/2026 registered at Police Station- Keladevi District-Karauli for the offences punishable under Sections 221, 226, 132 & 3(5) of BNS, 2023.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of order dated 09.07.2026, the petitioner has already appeared before the Investigating Officer and has been interrogated.
3. Learned counsel further submits that husband of the petitioner namely Amar Singh has already been enlarged on bail by the learned Trial Court against whom main allegations were there. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-8363/2026] petitioner is a female and therefore, she may be given the benefit of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel further submits that there are no criminal antecedents of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature in the past.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail application.
5. The Investigating Officer, who is present in person, submits that the petitioner has been interrogated and there is no requirment for any custodial interrogation or any recovery to be made.
6. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the fact that the petitioner has already appeared before the Investigating Officer and has been interrogated, and further considering that the offences are triable by Magistrate; the petitioner is a female; no custodial interrogation or recovery is to be made; there are no criminal antecedents; main accused namely Amar Singh has already been enlarged on bail, this Court deems it just and proper to grant the benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused-petitioner.
7. Consequently, the present anticipatory bail application filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, is allowed. It is directed that, in the event of arrest of the accused-petitioner, Smt. Seema W/o Amar Singh in connection with F.I.R. No.15/2026, Police Station- Keladevi District-Karauli, he shall be released on bail, provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of ₹1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) along with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of ₹50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each, to the
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-8363/2026] satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer/Station House Officer, subject to the following conditions:
(i) The accused-petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer as and when required and shall cooperate with the investigation.
(ii) The accused-petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat, or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer.
(iii) The accused-petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.
(iv) The accused-petitioner is further directed not to take undue advantage of the liberty granted to him or misuse the same. It is made clear that any observations made by this Court in the present bail application are only for the purpose of deciding the instant application and shall not influence or affect the merits of the case during the course of trial. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 180/RACHNA