Rajasthan High Court
CSA/247/2026 of MOOLCHAND KUMAWAT S/O DURGALAL, Vs SARPANCH GRAM PANCHAYAT, on 3 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 247/2026 CNR: RJHC020435082026 | URN: CSA / 378U / 2026 Moolchand Kumawat S/o Durgalal, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Dungarsi Ka Bas, Tehsil Kishangarh Renwal District Jaipur. ----Appellant Versus 1. Sarpanch Gram Panchayat,
[2026:RJ-JP:29909]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 247/2026
CNR: RJHC020435082026 | URN: CSA / 378U / 2026
Moolchand Kumawat S/o Durgalal, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Dungarsi Ka Bas, Tehsil Kishangarh Renwal District Jaipur.
----Appellant
Versus
1.
Sarpanch Gram Panchayat, Dungarsi Ka Bas, Tehsil Kishangarh Renwal District Jaipur.
2.
Gram Vikas Adhikari, Gram Panchayat, Dungarsi Ka Bas, Tehsil Kishangarh Renwal District Jaipur.
3.
Vikas Adhikari, Panchayat Samiti Sambharlake, Office Sambharlake District Jaipur.
4.
Tehsildar Kishangarh, Renwal District Jaipur.
5.
Durgalal Sharma, S/o Hanuman Prasad Sharma, Aged About 79 Years,
6.
Gopal Lal, S/o Hanuman Prasad Sharma, Aged About 77
Years,
7.
Shyamsunder, S/o Durgalal, Aged About 40 Years,
8.
Ramovtar, S/o Durgalal Sharma, Aged About 52 Years,
9.
Maliram, S/o Gopal Lal Sharma, Aged About 46 Years,
10.
Rajkumar, S/o Gopal Lal Sharma, Aged About 30 Years,
11.
Pawan Kumar, S/o Late Sh. Sitaram Sharma, Aged About 36 Years,
12.
Vijay Kumar, S/o Late Sh. Sitaram, Aged About 30 Years, All Are R/o Dungarsi Ka Bas, Tehsil Kishangarh Renwal District Jaipur.
13.
Hanuman Prasad S/o Ramhandra Kumawat, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Dungarsi Ka Bas, Tehsil Kishangarh, Renwal District Jaipur.
14.
Arjunlal S/o Sitaram Kumawat, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Dungarsi Ka Bas, Tehsil Kishangarh, Renwal District Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Appellant(s)
:
Mr. Asgar Khan
For Respondent(s)
:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
03/08/2026
[2026:RJ-JP:29909] (2 of 2) [CSA-247/2026]
1. Learned counsel for the appellant, upon instructions from his client, seeks permission to withdraw the present civil second appeal with liberty to the appellant to avail appropriate remedy available under the law.
2. Permission sought for is granted.
3. Accordingly, this civil second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for.
4. All pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-12