Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/8489/2026 of SHIVKESH S/O AMRITLAL Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 3 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8489/2026 CNR: RJHC020520002026 | URN: CRLMB / 15448U / 2026 Shivkesh S/o Amritlal, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Kanchroda, Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8489/2026
CNR: RJHC020520002026 | URN: CRLMB / 15448U / 2026
Shivkesh S/o Amritlal, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Kanchroda, Police Station Sapotara, District Karauli (Rajasthan)
(At Present Confined In District Jail Karauli, District Karauli).
----Accused-Petitioner/Applicant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Hari Krishana Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA
Judgment / Order
03/08/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 20.05.2026 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, District Karauli, in Criminal Bail Application (CIS) No.237/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.133/2026, Police Station-Sapotra, District-Karauli for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 137(2) & 140(2) of the BNS, 2023.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the FIR. He further submits that no such incident ever took place. Referring to the statement of the victim recorded under Section 180 of the BNS, 2023, he contends that the petitioner's scooty had been damaged and, therefore, the petitioner had demanded a sum of Rs. 1,50,000/- from the victim and his father. He further submits that there is no case of ransom.
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-8489/2026]
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the challan has been filed and the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time. Moreover, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature in past. Therefore, he prays that the petitioner may kindly be enlarged on bail, as the petitioner is in custody since 07.05.2026.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the present bail application.
5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the fact that challan has been filed; the petitioner is in custody since 07.05.2026; the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time; statement of the victim recorded under Section 180 of the BNS, 2023; there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature in past, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.
7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely-Shivkesh S/o Amritlal arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.133/2026, Police Station- Sapotra, District-Karauli, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-8489/2026] that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions:
(i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court;
(ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected;
(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 35/MAHIMA