Rajasthan High Court
CW/13301/2026 of NAVEEN KUMAR S/O GHANSHYAM VERMA Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 30 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13301/2026 CNR: RJHC020697672026 | URN: CW / 29198U / 2026 Naveen Kumar S/o Ghanshyam Verma, Aged About 38 Years, R/o 2-C-17, Sanjay Gandhi Nagar, Kota, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal
[2026:RJ-JP:29818]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13301/2026
CNR: RJHC020697672026 | URN: CW / 29198U / 2026
Naveen Kumar S/o Ghanshyam Verma, Aged About 38 Years, R/o 2-C-17, Sanjay Gandhi Nagar, Kota, Rajasthan
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Energy, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur
2.
Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd, Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) Through Its Secretary (Admn.).
3.
The Chief Controller Of Accounts (Hq-Ii), Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd, Jaipur.
4.
The Sr. Accounts Officer (Kstps), Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd, Kota.
5.
Nemi Chand Nagar, Jr. Accountant As Cao (Ctpp), Rvun, Chhabra, Baran.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with
Mr. Aamir Khan and
Ms. Kavita Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Virendra Lodha, Senior Advocate
assisted by
Mr. Jai Lodha
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
30/07/2026
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing at some length, submits that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the competent respondent authorities with regard to his grievances as raised in the present writ petition.
2. Heard and considered.
[2026:RJ-JP:29818] (2 of 2) [CW-13301/2026]
3. In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is allowed to make a representation to the competent respondent authorities with his grievances as raised in the present writ petition.
4. In case, the petitioner prefers any representation before the competent respondent authorities, they shall consider the same as early as possible.
5. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of as above.
6. The stay application and pending application, if any, also stand disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 282/ARTI SHARMA