Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/11614/2026 of PAWAN KUMAR DHAKAR S/O MOHANLAL Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 30 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Fourth Bail Application No. 11614/2026 CNR: RJHC020694062026 | URN: CRLMB / 21411U / 2026 1. Pawan Kumar Dhakar S/o Mohanlal, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Antana, Police Station Atru, District Baran, Rajasthan. ( The Accused
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Fourth Bail Application No.
11614/2026
CNR: RJHC020694062026 | URN: CRLMB / 21411U / 2026
1.
Pawan Kumar Dhakar S/o Mohanlal, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Antana, Police Station Atru, District Baran, Rajasthan.
(The Accused Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody In District Jail Baran).
2.
Chandra Prakash Nagar S/o Mohanlal, Aged About 43
Years, R/o Antana, Police Station Atru, District Baran, Rajasthan. (The Accused Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody In District Jail Baran)
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Manish Gupta with
Mr. Bhisma Kumar Singh
For Respondent(s)
:
Ms. Aarti Sharma, P.P.
Mr. Jagdish Singh Chauhan,
Mr. Vikram Singh Panwar and
Mr. Surendra Kumar Nagar for the
complainant
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
30/07/2026
1. Petitioners have filed the fourth bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.283/2025 registered with the Police Station Atru, District Baran for offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 109(1), 352 and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023.
2. The first bail application of the accused-petitioners bearing No.14184/2025 was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court
(2 of 4) [CRLMB-11614/2026] vide order dated 08.01.2026 with liberty to the petitioners to file fresh after examination of the injured complainant by the trial Court.
3. The second bail application of the petitioners bearing No.4477/2026 was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court vide order dated 24.03.2026 with liberty to the petitioners to file fresh after examination of the medical officers who have prepared the Medico-Legal Report of the injured.
4. The third bail application of the petitioners bearing No.7824/2026 was dismissed as withdraw by this Court vide order dated 20.05.2026.
5. The learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the material witnesses, including the injured witness and the Medical Officer, who has prepared the Medico Legal Report (MLR) of the injured- Murli, have been examined before the learned trial Court. He further submits that as per the statement of the Medical Officer, who has prepared the MLR of the injured, three injuries are found to be grievous in nature, but none of the injuries, which has been opined to be grievous in nature, is on the vital part of the body of the injured. He further submits that there are litigations pending between the both the parties. He further submits that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 04.10.2025 and trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, they may be released on bail.
6. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by the learned counsels for the complainant, has vehemently opposed the fourth
(3 of 4) [CRLMB-11614/2026] bail application and submits that the accused-petitioners have caused as many as twelve injuries to the injured- Murli, out of which three injuries are grievous in nature.
7. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor assisted by the learned counsels for the complainant.
8. As per the statement of the Medical Officer, who has prepared the MLR, recorded during his examination before the learned trial Court, has stated that three injuries were found to be grievous in nature.
9. On perusal of the MLR and the statement of the Medical Officer, none of the injuries, which has been opined to be grievous in nature, is on the vital part of the body of the injured- Murli. The accused-petitioners are said to be in custody since 04.10.2025.
10. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and so also the custody period of the accused-petitioners, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.
11. Accordingly, the fourth bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be
(4 of 4) [CRLMB-11614/2026] transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 2/ARTI SHARMA