Rajasthan High Court
CW/13294/2026 of NARAYAN SINGH CHAUDHARY S/O CHIRANJI LAL Vs RAJASTHAN RAJYA VIDYUT PRASARAN NIGAM LIMITED on 30 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13294/2026 CNR: RJHC020697782026 | URN: CW / 29191U / 2026 Narayan Singh Chaudhary S/o Chiranji Lal, Aged About 54 Years, R/o C-267, Surya Nagar, Alwar, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam
[2026:RJ-JP:29800]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13294/2026
CNR: RJHC020697782026 | URN: CW / 29191U / 2026
Narayan Singh Chaudhary S/o Chiranji Lal, Aged About 54 Years, R/o C-267, Surya Nagar, Alwar, Rajasthan
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur, Raj. Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director.
2.
The Secretary (Admn.), Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur, Raj.
3.
The Joint Secretary (Estt-I), Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur, Raj.
4.
The Superintendent Engineer (T And C ), Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited, Alwar.
5.
Vishram Meena, Working As Xen (Rpm), Rrvpnl, Ajmer.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with
Mr. Aamir Khan and
Ms. Kavita Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Rahul Lodha
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
30/07/2026
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing at some length, submits that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the competent respondent authorities with regard to his grievances as raised in the present writ petition.
2. Heard and considered.
[2026:RJ-JP:29800] (2 of 2) [CW-13294/2026]
3. In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is allowed to make a representation to the competent respondent authorities with his grievances as raised in the present writ petition.
4. In case, the petitioner prefers any representation before the competent respondent authorities, they shall consider the same as early as possible.
5. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of as above.
6. The stay application and pending application, if any, also stand disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 280/ARTI SHARMA