Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/10059/2026 of PAWAN KUMAR S/O SAJJAN SINGH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 29 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10059/2026 CNR: RJHC020602972026 | URN: CRLMB / 18692U / 2026 Pawan Kumar S/o Sajjan Singh, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Teent, Police Station Khol, District Rewari (Haryana) (Presently Confined In Sub Jail
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10059/2026
CNR: RJHC020602972026 | URN: CRLMB / 18692U / 2026
Pawan Kumar S/o Sajjan Singh, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Teent, Police Station Khol, District Rewari (Haryana) (Presently Confined In Sub Jail Behror).
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Prithvipal
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
29/07/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed against the order of the learned trial Court dated 25.06.2026 on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 158/2024 registered at Police Station Mandhan, District Kotputli-Behror(Rajasthan) for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 420 and 336 of IPC, in which charge-sheet has been submitted under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; that charge-sheet has already been filed. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long. He further submits that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. He submits that other co-accused has already been enlarged on bail and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-10059/2026] would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove but concurs with the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 21.06.2026; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner; that co-accused Pradeep has already been enlarged on bail by the Trial Court itself and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Pawan Kumar S/o Sajjan Singh is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any offence(s) during currency of the bail.
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-10059/2026]
7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court and Jail authorities through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 76/HEENA