Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/9457/2026 of SURESH CHAND @ GUDDA S/O MANIRAM Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 29 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9457/2026 CNR: RJHC020570432026 | URN: CRLMB / 17491U / 2026 Suresh Chand @ Gudda, Aged About 38 Years, Bharatpur, R/o ballabhgarh Ropad, Town Bhusawar, Police Station Bhusawar, District Bhratpur(Raj.) (At
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9457/2026
CNR: RJHC020570432026 | URN: CRLMB / 17491U / 2026
Suresh Chand @ Gudda, Aged About 38 Years, Bharatpur, R/o ballabhgarh Ropad, Town Bhusawar, Police Station Bhusawar, District Bhratpur(Raj.)
(At present confined in Sub Jail Bayana, District Bhratpur)
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Bharatpur
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sogarwal with
Mr. Hitesh Haritwal,
Ms. Ayushi Choudhary,
Mr. Pawan Kumar
For State
For Respondent(s)
:
:
Mr. Naresh Gupta, P.P.
Mr. Rajneesh Gupta
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA
Judgment / Order
29/07/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 09.06.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Weir, District Bharatpur (Raj.) , in Bail Application No.116/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.100/2026, Police Station Weir, District Bharatpur for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 109(1), 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the F.I.R., and there is no allegation qua the petitioner of having committed any injury on the victim. He submits that the allegations are general in nature and further, that challan in the case has already been filed. Moreover, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time and except the
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-9457/2026] offence under Section 109 BNS, 2023 all the other offences are triable by a Magistrate, therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail as the accused is in custody since 17.05.2026.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposes the bail application.
4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the complainant and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
5. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the submissions advanced, and particularly the fact that challan has been filed; except the offence under Section 109, BNS,2023 all other offences are triable by a Magistrate; the conclusion of trial is likely to take a considerable time; after perusal of the injury as well as the statement of the victim Kewal, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application deserves to be accepted.
6. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner - Suresh Chand @ Gudda arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 100/2026, Police Station Weir, District Bharatpur, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till the completion of the trial and with additional following conditions:
(i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court;
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-9457/2026]
(ii) The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; and
(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 35/KRATIKA