Rajasthan High Court
CW/13574/2026 of ABHILASH NIMESH S/O SHRI VIKRAM SINGH, Vs JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED on 29 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13574/2026 CNR: RJHC020698742026 | URN: CW / 29594U / 2026 Abhilash Nimesh S/o Shri Vikram Singh, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Mathura Gate, Bharatpur At Present Working On The Post Of Commercial Assistant - II In The Office Of
[2026:RJ-JP:29426]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13574/2026
CNR: RJHC020698742026 | URN: CW / 29594U / 2026
Abhilash Nimesh S/o Shri Vikram Singh, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Mathura Gate, Bharatpur At Present Working On The Post Of Commercial Assistant - II In The Office Of Assistant Engineer (O
And M) Rajakhera, District Dholpur
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur Its Managing Director
2.
Chief Personnel Officer, Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur
3.
Assistant Engineer (O And M), Rajakhera, District Dholpur
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. M.I. Abbasi
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Ankur Srivastava
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
29/07/2026
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a low paid employee and he has been transferred to a remote place from Rajakhera, District Dholpur to Anta, District Baran. He further submits that the wife of the petitioner is a Government employee and posted at Bharatpur. He further submits that no one is posted on the post which the petitioner was holding prior to passing of the impugned order.
2. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that the impugned transfer order does not suffer any illegality and in
[2026:RJ-JP:29426] (2 of 2) [CW-13574/2026] case, the petitioner has any family problem, he may submit a representation to the respondents.
3. Considered the submissions made by at Bar.
4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the respondents, the present writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to the respondents within a period of seven (7) days from today with regard to his grievances as raised in the present writ petition.
5. In case, the respondents receive any such representation from the petitioner within a period of seven (7) days, same may be considered and an appropriate order be passed in accordance with law.
6. Looking to the fact that no one has been posted on the post which the petitioner was holding prior to passing of the impugned transfer order, the Court deems just and proper to stay the effect and operation of the impugned transfer order dated 10.07.2026 till disposal of the representation, if any submitted by the petitioner.
7. In case, the petitioner fails to submit the representation within a period of seven days, then this interim order shall cease its effect automatically.
8. The stay application and pending application, if any, also stand disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 26/ARTI SHARMA