Rajasthan High Court
CW/13497/2026 of ALOK GARG SON OF LATE SHRI NIRANJAN LAL GARG Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 29 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13497/2026 CNR: RJHC020702632026 | URN: CW / 29520U / 2026 Alok Garg Son Of Late Shri Niranjan Lal Garg, Aged About 58 Years And One Month, Resident Of 4/24, Keshri Chand Choudhary Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur. ----Petitioner
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13497/2026
CNR: RJHC020702632026 | URN: CW / 29520U / 2026
Alok Garg Son Of Late Shri Niranjan Lal Garg, Aged About 58
Years And One Month, Resident Of 4/24, Keshri Chand Choudhary Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Energy Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
Managing Director, Rajasthan Rajya Vidhyut Prasaran Nigam Limited, Vidhyut Bhawan, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur.
3.
Secretary, Administration, Rajasthan Rajya Vidhyut Prasaran Nigam Limited, Vidhyut Bhawan, Jyoti Nagar, Rajpath, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Ashok Bansal
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Rahul Lodha
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
29/07/2026
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is working on the post of Executive Engineer (XEN) at Bagru, Jaipur and vide impugned order dated 10.07.2026, he has been transferred at Kanasar, District Bikaner, that is a remote place. He further submits that the petitioner met an accident and because of that accident, he is facing great hardship. He also submits that on the post from which the petitioner has been transferred, no one has been posted, meaning thereby, the said post is lying vacant.
(2 of 3) [CW-13497/2026]
2. After making the submissions, the learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the respondents as regards his grievances and for posting him at a nearby place, looking to his medical condition.
3. The learned counsel for the respondents though submits that the transfer of the petitioner in no manner can be said to be illegal or arbitrary, however, in case any representation is received from the petitioner, they would consider it in objective manner.
4. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar.
5. In view of the above, the petitioner is allowed a liberty to make a representation to the competent respondents authorities within a period of seven (7) days from today.
6. In case the petitioner prefers the representation within a period of seven days before the competent respondents authorities, they will consider the same and pass an appropriate order, considering his grievances as mentioned in the representation.
7. Looking to the fact that the post from which the petitioner has been transferred, is still lying vacant, the effect and operation of the impugned order dated 10.07.2026 shall remain stayed qua the present petitioner, till disposal of the representation.
8. In case, the petitioner fails to submit the representation within seven days then this interim order shall cease its effect automatically.
(3 of 3) [CW-13497/2026]
9. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of.
10. The stay application and pending application, if any, also stand disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 17/ARTI SHARMA