Rajasthan High Court
CMA/2379/2025 of PKB REALTORS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs GUMAN BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. on 29 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2379/2025 CNR: RJHC020451342025 | URN: CMA / 3892U / 2025 PKB Realtors Private Limited, Registered Office 14, Netaji Subhash Road, 3Rd Floor, Kolkata 700001 Through Director Pawan Kumar Biyani S/o Late Shri Sitamram
[2026:RJ-JP:29367-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2379/2025
CNR: RJHC020451342025 | URN: CMA / 3892U / 2025
PKB Realtors Private Limited, Registered Office 14, Netaji Subhash Road, 3Rd Floor, Kolkata 700001 Through Director Pawan Kumar Biyani S/o Late Shri Sitamram Biyani, R/o D-26, Durga Marg, D-2-B, Banipark, Jaipur Rajasthan
----Appellant
Versus
Guman Builders And Developers Pvt. Ltd., Registered Address 171, Officers Campus Extension, Khatipura Jaipur Rajasthan Through Director And Authorized Signatory Shri Shankar Khandelwal S/o Shri Mohanlal Khandelwal
----Respondent
For Appellant(s)
:
Mr. Gunjan Pathak, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Rishabh Khandelwal, Adv.
Mr. Akshay Bhardwaj, Adv. for ED
Mr. Mohit Kumar Soni, Adv.
Mr. Anand Singh, Adv.
Mr. Rajat Shankar Mishra, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
29/07/2026
1. The appellant-company is before this Court seeking quashing of the order dated 25.04.2025, passed by learned Commercial Court No.1, Jaipur Metro-II, Jaipur, whereby an application filed by the respondent under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking certain interim reliefs, was allowed by directing the parties to maintain status quo.
2. At the very outset, it has been brought to the notice of this Court that, during the pendency of the present appeal, not only has a learned
[2026:RJ-JP:29367-DB] (2 of 2) [CMA-2379/2025] Arbitrator been appointed, but the arbitral proceedings have also commenced before the Arbitral Tribunal.
3. In that view of the matter, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the impugned order or the application filed by the respondent, the present appeal is disposed of with liberty to the appellant to file an appropriate application before the learned Arbitrator to seek modification, recall, or any other further order in accordance with law.
4. With the aforesaid liberty, the instant appeal stands disposed of.
5. All pending applications also stand disposed of. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (ARUN MONGA),J 7-/Ashwani-Anu