Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/11717/2026 of ROBIN S/O SHRI HASAM KHAN Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 29 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11717/2026 CNR: RJHC020697592026 | URN: CRLMB / 21604U / 2026 Robin S/o Shri Hasam Khan, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Sallu Ka Bas, Tan Shekhpur, Police Station Sadar, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (At Present
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11717/2026
CNR: RJHC020697592026 | URN: CRLMB / 21604U / 2026
Robin S/o Shri Hasam Khan, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Sallu Ka Bas, Tan Shekhpur, Police Station Sadar, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar).
----Accused-Petitioner/Applicant
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Ms. Faziya G. Khan
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
29/07/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed against the order of learned Trial Court dated 17.07.2026 on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 279/2026 registered at Police Station Sadar Alwar, District Alwar for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 112(2), 238(b), 316(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of BNS and Sections 66C and 66D of IT Act.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long; that investigation has already been completed; that the accused-petitioner is not required for further investigation; that charge-sheet is proposed to be filed; that conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-11717/2026] behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove but did not dispute the fact that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner.
4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record. Keeping in view the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 06.06.2026; that investigation has already been completed; that accused-petitioner is not required for further investigation; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner; that charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner is proposed to be filed; that the trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Robin S/o Shri Hasam Khan is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail.
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-11717/2026]
7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to submit his present address along with mobile number to the concerned SHO/IO within three days of release and the concerned SHO/IO shall verify the said mobile number and his address. In case, the accused- petitioner changes his address or mobile number, he shall submit the same before the concerned SHO/IO and also before the concerned learned Trial Court. The accused-petitioner is further directed to submit to the concerned SHO/IO, a comprehensive list of all electronic devices in his possession, including mobile phones, laptops, tablets, external hard disks and pen drive along with their IMEI numbers and serial numbers within three days of release under this bail order.
8. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
9. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned Trial Court, Jail authorities and S.H.O. through e- mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J PUNEET KUMAR/115