Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/11726/2026 of MANOJ @ CHETA S/O NIHAL SINGH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 29 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous IInd Bail Application No. 11725/2026 CNR: RJHC020701012026 | URN: CRLMB / 21613U / 2026 Deendayal @ Deenu S/o Kishansingh, R/o Sukhe Ka Pura, Police Station Kanchanpur, District Dholpur. (At Present Confined In District Jail,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous IInd Bail Application No. 11725/2026
CNR: RJHC020701012026 | URN: CRLMB / 21613U / 2026
Deendayal @ Deenu S/o Kishansingh, R/o Sukhe Ka Pura, Police Station Kanchanpur, District Dholpur. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur).
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous IInd Bail Application No. 11726/2026
CNR: RJHC020701072026 | URN: CRLMB / 21615U / 2026
Manoj @ Cheta S/o Nihal Singh, R/o Bateshwar Khurd, Police Station Badi Sadar, District Dholpur. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur)
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Anil Jain
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
29/07/2026
1. These instant second bail applications have been filed against the order of learned Trial Court dated 07.02.2026 and 08.01.2026 on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 238/2025 registered at Police Station Bari Sadar, District Dholpur for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 305(a) & 331(6) of B.N.S., 2023.
(2 of 4) [CRLMB-11725/2026]
2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the accused-petitioners are in custody since long; that the accused-petitioners are not named in the FIR; that the charge-sheet has been filed. He further submits that the complainant along with other material witnesses have already been examined during trial and co-accused has already been enlarged on bail; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused- petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused- petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the accused- petitioners hereinabove and submits that there is one another criminal case registered against the accused-petitioner, Manoj @ Cheta S/o Nihal Singh and six other criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner, Deendayal @ Deenu S/o Kishansingh, therefore, the accused-petitioners may not be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 BNSS.
4. Heard the contentions put forth by learned counsel for both the parties and perused the material available on record in the form of charge-sheet and copy of statement of witnesses recorded during trial; that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 19.12.2025; that the accused-petitioners are not named in the FIR; that no Test Identification Parade has been conducted; that nothing has been recovered at the instance of the accused- petitioners; that complainant (PW1), Brijesh (PW2), Renu (PW5),
(3 of 4) [CRLMB-11725/2026] Mahadevi (PW3) and Saurabh (PW4) have already been examined during trial and they have turned hostile as nothing incriminating has been stated against the accused-petitioner; that co-accused person namely Sachin has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 21.11.2025 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14683/2025; that the trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.
5. Therefore, these instant second bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are accordingly, allowed and the accused- petitioners (1) Deendayal @ Deenu S/o Kishansingh & (2) Manoj @ Cheta S/o Nihal Singh are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence on 25th of every month in the concerned police station till completion of trial of this case.
7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
(4 of 4) [CRLMB-11725/2026]
8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of these instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned Trial Court, Jail authorities and S.H.O. through e- mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J PUNEET KUMAR/117-118