Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/8436/2026 of BANSHI LAL S/O HEERA LAL Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 29 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8436/2026 CNR: RJHC020511862026 | URN: CRLMB / 15364U / 2026 Banshi Lal S/o Heera Lal, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Bithola, Thana Sadar Tonk, District Tonk, (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus State Of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8436/2026
CNR: RJHC020511862026 | URN: CRLMB / 15364U / 2026
Banshi Lal S/o Heera Lal, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Bithola, Thana Sadar Tonk, District Tonk, (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Aveesh Mourya
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Vijay Yadav, P.P.
Mr. Girraj Prasad, ASI,
(At present ASI Baroni, District Tonk)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA
Judgment / Order
29/07/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 08.05.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Malpura, District Tonk (Raj.), in Bail Application No.70/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.64/2026, Police Station Diggi, District Tonk for the offences under Section 316(2), 318(4), 319(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66C & 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the challan in the case has already been filed. Moreover, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time and even the offences are triable by the Magistrate, therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail as the accused is in custody since 27.04.2026.
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-8436/2026]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.
4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
5. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the submissions advanced, and particularly the fact that challan has been filed; all the offences are triable by Magistrate; the conclusion of trial is likely to take a considerable time; further looking that only two cases have been reported to be pending against the petitioner which are of different nature, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application deserves to be accepted.
6. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely Banshi Lal S/o Heera Lal arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.64/2026, Police Station Diggi, District Tonk, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions:
(i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court;
(ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected;
(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-8436/2026] him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and
(iv) In the event the petitioner is found involved in any other cyber fraud case in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 92/KRATIKA