Debts Recovery Tribunals and Appellate Tribunals
GOPAL MEENA vs BAID FINSERVE LIMITED on 28 February 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur *
Item No. 53 Case No. MA/38/2024 GOPAL MEENA Vs BAID FINSERVE LIMITED Date: 28.02.2025. Proceedings through hybrid mode Present: Shri Prem Prakash Bunkar, Counsel for the Applicant Shri Sandeep Bansiwal, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI This Misc. application moved by the applicant for restoration of Securitization Application, but this SA was not registered as the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act was not filed nor requisite court fee was paid. Therefore, the Securitization Application cannot be restored. In view of the above observations, this Misc. Application stands dismissed. The applicant is at liberty to take steps if the respondent bank proceeds. File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur