Rajasthan High Court
CRLAS/1418/2026 of MUFEED SON OF BALJEET Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 28 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1418/2026 CNR: RJHC020579582026 | URN: CRLAS / 2519U / 2026 Mufeed Son Of Baljeet, Age 25 Years, Resident Of Samola, Police Station Arawali Vihar, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Alwar)
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1418/2026
CNR: RJHC020579582026 | URN: CRLAS / 2519U / 2026
Mufeed Son Of Baljeet, Age 25 Years, Resident Of Samola, Police Station Arawali Vihar, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Alwar) ----Accused-Appellant
Versus
1.
State of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
2.
Murarilal Son Of Prabhu Singh, Resident Of Ramkripal Nagar Old Bhurasiddh Jaipur Road Alwar (Raj.)
----Respondents
For Appellant(s)
:
Mr. Girish Khandelwal
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
28/07/2026
1. This criminal appeal has been filed on behalf of the accused- appellant under Section 14(A) of S.C./S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, in connection with FIR No. 105/2022 registered at Police Station Aravali Vihar, District Alwar, for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 332, 353 & 307 of IPC and Sections 4 & 25 of Arms Act and Section 3(2)(va)of SC/ST Act.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-appellant submits that the accused-appellant has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the accused-appellant is in custody since long; investigation is completed and the charge-sheet is proposed to be filed. He further submits that injuries sustained by the injured are neither fatal nor dangerous to life. He further submits that other co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail and trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by
(2 of 3) [CRLAS-1418/2026] keeping the accused-appellant in custody and, therefore, prays to enlarge the accused-appellant on bail.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions put forth by learned counsel for the accused- appellant hereinabove and did not dispute with the fact that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused- appellant.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the accused-appellant that the accused-appellant is behind the bars since 04.06.2026; that investigation is completed and charge-sheet is proposed to be filed; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-appellant; that the co-accused persons namely Nawab Singh, Anil Jatav, Rahul Verma, Shivlal @ Shiba, Deepak @ Kitru, Pawan Urf Chunchu and Dashrath Verma have already been enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.03.2022 and 10.05.2022 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application Nos. 3711/2022, 3712/2022, 4206/2022, 4349/2022, 6595/2022 and 6596/2022 respectively; that other co-accused persons namely Vikram Khan @ Bikkar @ Bhikkar, Saddin Khan @ Saddim @ Saddik, Juber Khan, Jahid Khan @ Jadda, Deen Mohammad @ Lala and Saruf Khan @ Sharukh Khan have already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 19.04.2022, 25.07.2022, 08.06.2022 and 18.07.2022 in S.B. Criminal Appeal Nos. 580/2022, 570/2022, 1341/2022, 1014/2022, 1015/2022 and 1136/2022 respectively. Hence, this Court without commenting anything on
(3 of 3) [CRLAS-1418/2026] merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-appellant on bail.
5. Consequently, this instant appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 13.06.2026 passed by Special Court, SC and ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Alwar (Rajasthan) in Bail Application No. 130/2026 is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant Mufeed Son Of Baljeet be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the following conditions:-
(i) The accused-appellant shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner.
(ii) The accused-appellant shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the law.
(iii) The accused-appellant shall attend the hearing of the trial Court on the date fixed by the trial Court or as and when asked to appear before the trial Court.
(iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the accused-appellant shall be liable to be cancelled.
6. The observation made hereinabove is only for the decision of the instant criminal appeal and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned Trial Court and Jail authorities through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J PUNEET KUMAR/130