Rajasthan High Court
CW/13609/2026 of DR. POONAM SWAMIM DIXIT, D/O SHRI RAMESH BAJPAYEE Vs NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AYURVEDA (NIA) on 28 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13609/2026 CNR: RJHC020709882026 | URN: CW / 29650U / 2026 Dr. Poonam Swamim Dixit, D/o Shri Ramesh Bajpayee, Aged About 42 Years, R/o 17/1, B-7, Main Block Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi - 110029 ----Petitioner
[2026:RJ-JP:29270]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13609/2026
CNR: RJHC020709882026 | URN: CW / 29650U / 2026
Dr. Poonam Swamim Dixit, D/o Shri Ramesh Bajpayee, Aged About 42 Years, R/o 17/1, B-7, Main Block Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi - 110029
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
National Institute Of Ayurveda (Nia), A Deemed To Be University, Having Its Campus At Madhav Vilas Palace, Amer Road, Jaipur - 302002, Rajasthan, Through Its Vice- Chancellor/registrar.
2.
Union Of India, Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Ayush, Government Of India, Ayush Bhawan, B Block, Gpo Complex, Ina, New Delhi - 110023.
3.
National Commission For Indian System Of Medicine (Ncism), Having Its Office At Plot No. T-19, 1St And 2Nd Floor, Block - Iv, Dhanwantri Bhawan, Road No. 66, Punjabi Bagh(West), New Delhi - 110026 - Through Its Chairman.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Anurag Kalavatiya
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Anurag Agarwal for respondent
No.1
Dr. T.N. Sharma for respondent No.2
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
28/07/2026 The learned counsels for the respondents have raised a preliminary objection that the issue agitated in the present writ petition is within the jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal (for short ‘CAT’) and, therefore, the present writ petition
[2026:RJ-JP:29270] (2 of 2) [CW-13609/2026] is not maintainable, as the petitioner is having an alternative efficacious remedy of appeal before the CAT. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the preliminary objection raised by the learned counsels for the respondents, the petitioner may be given liberty to approach the CAT. In view of the preliminary objection raised by the learned counsels for the respondents, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy before the CAT. The stay application and pending application, if any, also stand disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 57/ARTI SHARMA