Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/7536/2026 of SANWAR SINGH RAWAT S/O SHRI RAYMAL SINGH RAWAT Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 28 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7536/2026 CNR: RJHC020458072026 | URN: CRLMB / 13726U / 2026 Sanwar Singh Rawat S/o Shri Raymal Singh Rawat, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Chainpura, Post Office Bhawanikhera, Ps Nasirabad Sadar,

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7536/2026

CNR: RJHC020458072026 | URN: CRLMB / 13726U / 2026

Sanwar Singh Rawat S/o Shri Raymal Singh Rawat, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Chainpura, Post Office Bhawanikhera, Ps Nasirabad Sadar, District Ajmer.

(Accused Is In Judicial Custody At Central Jail, Ajmer Since 26.04.2026, Arrested On 23.04.2026).

---Accused-Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Shobit Tiwari

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP

Mr. Manga Ram, ASI, Police Station

Christian Ganj, District-Ajmer

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA

Judgment / Order

28/07/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 05.05.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No.5, Ajmer, in Criminal Misc. Case No.501/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.42/2024, Police Station Christian Ganj, District-Ajmer for the offences under Section 419, 420, 406 & 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 23.04.2026. He further submits that the challan in the case has already been filed, offences are triable by Magistrate, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time. He also submits that the main accused, who was the account

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-7536/2026] holder and proprietor of the alleged firm against whom the allegations of cheating have been made, was Anil Sharma and he has already been enlarged on bail by the learned Trial Court vide its order dated 01.11.2025 after remaining in custody for about four months. He also submits that the petitioner has remained in custody for more than three months. Therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the present bail application and submits that against the petitioner there are three similar cases, which have been reported to be pending. He also submits that the petitioner may not be enlarged on bail.

4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

5. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 23.04.2026; offences are triable by Magistrate; the challan has been filed; trial will take considerable time, main accused Anil Sharma has already been enlarged on bail by the learned Trial Court and further considering the fact that there are three cases pending against the petitioner of similar nature, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted subject to imposition of stringent conditions.

6. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely-Sanwar Singh Rawat S/o Shri Raymal Singh Rawat arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.42/2024, Police Station Christian Ganj, District-Ajmer, shall be

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-7536/2026] released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court;

(ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected;

(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and

(iv) In the event the petitioner is found involved in any other case of similar nature in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein.

(v) The accused-petitioner shall mark his presence before the concerned police station once in a month as fixed by the Investigating Officer and a register shall be maintained for the same by Investigating Officer.

(vi) In case of any change of residential address, the accused-petitioner shall immediately inform the Investigating Officer as well as the trial Court. (BIPIN GUPTA),J Sudha/113

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead