Rajasthan High Court
CW/3607/2026 of SURENDRA KUMAR MEENA SON OF SHRI KAILASH CHANDRA MEENA Vs UNION OF INDIA on 28 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3607/2026 CNR: RJHC020184152026 | URN: CW / 7989U / 2026 Surendra Kumar Meena Son Of Shri Kailash Chandra Meena, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Anand Hospital, Jagdamba Colony, Jamat Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan-303503
[2026:RJ-JP:29072]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3607/2026
CNR: RJHC020184152026 | URN: CW / 7989U / 2026
Surendra Kumar Meena Son Of Shri Kailash Chandra Meena, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Anand Hospital, Jagdamba Colony, Jamat Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan-303503
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Union Of India, Through Secretary, Department Of School Education And Literacy, Shastri Bhawan, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road, Rajpath Area, Central Secretariat, New Delhi-110001.
2.
Secretary, Central Board Of Secondary Education, CBSE
Integrated Office Complex, Sector-23, Phase-I, Dwarka, New Delhi - 110077.
3.
Director, (CTET) CBSE, Central Board Of Secondary Education, CBSE Integrated Office Complex, Sector-23, Phase-I, Dwarka, New Delhi - 110077
4.
Deputy
Commissioner
(Recruitment/establishment
Section), Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan And Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti, Educator Ministry, Government Of India, 18 Institutional Area, Shaheed Jeet Marg, New Delhi -
110016.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Pankaj Choudhary
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. M.S. Raghav, for R.1 & 2
Ms. Deepti Jindal, for R.3
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
28/07/2026 In view of the preliminary objection raised by the learned counsel for the respondent that the jurisdiction with regard to present issue lies with the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in
[2026:RJ-JP:29072] (2 of 2) [CW-3607/2026] view of the provisions of the Central Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this writ petition, with liberty to avail the remedy of OA/Appeal before the CAT. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed. The CAT is requested to consider the fact that the petitioner was provisionally allowed to appear in the Tire-2 examination under the interim order of this Court. Stay application as well as pending application/s, if any, also stand/s disposed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/13