Rajasthan High Court
CCP/1030/2026 of R.K. FITNESS CENTER Vs SHRI JAGDISH BAIRWA, on 28 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1030/2026 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18819/2025 CNR: RJHC020543332026 | URN: CCP / 1079U / 2026 1. R.k. Fitness Center, N.h. 52. Rajgarh Road, Churu Through Its Partner, Jaideep Dhaka S/o-Ram Kumar Dhaka, Aged-38
[2026:RJ-JP:29222]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1030/2026
IN
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18819/2025
CNR: RJHC020543332026 | URN: CCP / 1079U / 2026
1.
R.k. Fitness Center, N.h. 52. Rajgarh Road, Churu Through Its Partner, Jaideep Dhaka S/o-Ram Kumar Dhaka, Aged-38 Years, R/o-Ward No. 21. Gandhi Nagar, Churu (Raj.)
2.
Tonk Fitness Center, Near D.t.o Officer, Jaipur Road, Sohela, Tehsil -Peeplu, Tonk (Raj.) Through Its Proprietor Adit Sharma S/o Dinesh Chand Sharma, Aged 30 Years, R/o -1, Agra Road, Near R.k. Joshi School, Brahampuri Colony, Dausa (Raj.).
3.
Indira Vehicle Fitness Center, Near Sankalp School, Vill- Vrindavan, Teh. Jhalarapatan, Jhalawar (Raj.) Through Its Partner Ramkaran Choudhary S/o Rooparam, Aged 65
Years, R/o-Godam Ki Talai, Bhagat Singh Colony, Jhalawar (Raj.).
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
Shri Jagdish Bairwa, Registering Authority, (Ats) Cum Additional Transport Commissioner, Department Of Transport And Raodsafety. Jaipur.
2.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Transport, Secretariat, Jaipur.
----Contemnor-Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Saurav Choudhary
For Respondent(s)
:
-
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
28/07/2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners, upon instructions from his client, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition on account of subsequent developments.
[2026:RJ-JP:29222] (2 of 2) [CCP-1030/2026]
2. Permission sought for is granted.
3. In view of the above, the present contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J 14/VINAY