Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/11598/2026 of MANIRAM @ MANEERAM S/O LAXMAN Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 27 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 11598/2026 CNR: RJHC020694772026 | URN: CRLMB / 21393U / 2026 Maniram @ Maneeram S/o Laxman, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Akodiya, Police Station Arain, District Ajmer (Raj.) (At Present In Central Jail,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 11598/2026
CNR: RJHC020694772026 | URN: CRLMB / 21393U / 2026
Maniram @ Maneeram S/o Laxman, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Akodiya, Police Station Arain, District Ajmer (Raj.) (At Present In Central Jail, Ajmer).
----Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sogarwal
Mr. Hitesh Haritwal
For Respondent(s)
:
Ms. Aarti Sharma, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
27/07/2026
1. Petitioner has filed this 2nd bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No. 066/2025, registered with the Police Station Kishangarh, Distt. Ajmer for offence under Sections 8/15 of NDPS Act, 1985.
2. Heard.
3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the Challan Papers bearing S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2844/2026.
4. The first bail application of the petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 22.04.2026, with liberty to file afresh after filing of the charge-sheet.
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-11598/2026]
5. The Police after completion of the investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the matter. The petitioner is said to have been in custody since 31.01.2026. As per the facts, the prosecution story is that there was recovery of 54.490 Kg Dodha-Chura from the house of co-accused namely Ratan.
6. As per the learned Public Prosecutor, the allegation and evidence against the present accused-petitioner are that the co-accused, from whose house the alleged Dodha-Chura was recovered, was using a mobile phone with the SIM card registered in the name of the present accused-petitioner.
7. As per the submissions made by the learned Public Prosecutor, there is no other evidence connecting the accused- petitioner with the alleged offence except the fact that the co-accused, Ratan, was using a SIM card registered in the name of the present accused-petitioner. Merely because another person was using a mobile phone or a SIM card registered in the name of some other person, cannot be said a connection of the person with the alleged offence committed by the other person.
8. Looking to the facts and the evidence collected, this Court is prima facie satisfied as required under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. Accordingly, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
9. This second bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-11598/2026] One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J RAVINDRA /3