Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/7033/2026 of OMPRAKASH @ OMI BANA S/O SHRI MEGH SINGH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 27 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7033/2026 CNR: RJHC020427412026 | URN: CRLMB / 12721U / 2026 Omprakash @ Omi Bana S/o Shri Megh Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o House No. 180/81, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur-East. (Presently Confined At Central
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7033/2026
CNR: RJHC020427412026 | URN: CRLMB / 12721U / 2026
Omprakash @ Omi Bana S/o Shri Megh Singh, Aged About 30
Years, R/o House No. 180/81, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur-East.
(Presently Confined At Central Jail, Jaipur).
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Vijay Singh
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
27/07/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed against the order of the learned trial Court dated 28.04.2026 on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 260/2026 registered at Police Station Pratap Nagar (Jaipur City (East)), District Jaipur City (East) for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 3 and 25(1-B)(a) of Arms Act.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long; that charge-sheet has already been filed; that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-7033/2026]
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions preferred by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove. It is further submits that there are several criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner so, the bail application may not be entertained.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and material available on record. Keeping in view the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 20.04.2026; that the charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner has already been filed; that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Omprakash @ Omi Bana S/o Shri Megh Singh is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his present on 25th of every month in the concerned police station till the completion of trial of the case.
7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-7033/2026] against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court, Jail Authorities and SHO through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 20/KAVISH