CRLMB/9018/2026 of RAMDAYAL S/O RAMNIWAS Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 27 July 2026

1. Ramdayal S/o Ramniwas, R/o Mehmudnagar, Police Station Aligarh, District Tonk.

2. Murari S/o Ramdayal, R/o Mehmudnagar, Police Station Aligarh, District Tonk. ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitesh Dadhich For State For Respondent(s) : : Mr. Naresh Gupta, P.P. Mr. Prahlad Rai, I.O., Police Station Uniyara, Tonk Mr. Dipendra Kumar Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 27/07/2026

1. The present criminal miscellaneous bail application has been preferred by the accused-petitioner under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No. 93/2026, registered at Police Station-Uniyara, District-Tonk, for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 333, 324(4) of the BNS, 2023.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of order dated 06.07.2026, both parties have appeared before the Investigating Officer and has submitted the compromise. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner may be enlarge on anticipatory bail.

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-9018/2026]

3. Learned counsel for the complainant does not dispute the fact of compromise and also do not oppose if the bail application of the petitioner is allowed.

4. The Investigating Officer is present in person and has placed the status report on record, submitting that the parties have appeared before him and produced the compromise. He has further reported that the compromise has been verified by him and that the parties have entered into the same voluntarily, of their own free will, and without any duress or coercion.

5. Learned Public Prosecutor has strongly opposed the bail application.

6. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

7. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the submissions advanced and particularly the fact all the offences are triable by Magistrate; parties have entered into compromise which has been verified by the investigating officer. Further the complainant do not oppose the bail application, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application deserves to be accepted.

7. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, is allowed. It is directed that, in the event of the arrest of the accused-petitioner, (i) Ramdayal S/o Ramniwas (ii) Murari S/o Ramdayal, in connection with FIR No. 93/2026, registered at Police Station-Uniyara, District-Tonk, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) along with two sound and

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-9018/2026] solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each, to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer/Station House Officer, subject to the following conditions:

(i) The accused-petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer as and when required and shall cooperate with the investigation;

(ii) The accused-petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat, or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing those facts to the Court or to any Police Officer;

(iii) The accused-petitioner shall not leave India without the prior permission of the concerned Court; and

(iv) The accused-petitioner is further directed not to take undue advantage of the liberty granted to him or misuse the same. It is made clear that any observations made by this Court in the present bail application are only for the purpose of deciding the instant application and shall not influence or affect the merits of the case during the course of trial. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 104/KRATIKA