Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/10379/2026 of SANJAY YADAV S/O SHRI SHYAM SUNDAR Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 27 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10379/2026 CNR: RJHC020623662026 | URN: CRLMB / 19232U / 2026 Sanjay Yadav S/o Shri Shyam Sundar, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Choudhary Lakkhiram Arya Anarthalaya Guhana Road Rohtak, District Rohtak, Currently
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10379/2026
CNR: RJHC020623662026 | URN: CRLMB / 19232U / 2026
Sanjay Yadav S/o Shri Shyam Sundar, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Choudhary Lakkhiram Arya Anarthalaya Guhana Road Rohtak, District Rohtak, Currently Resident Of Sandeep Gurjar Resident Of Torda, Police Station Pragpura, District Kotputli-Behror. (At Present Confined At District Jail Kotputli).
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Manish Kumar Meena
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
27/07/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed against the order of the learned trial Court dated 30.06.2026 on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 0248/2026 registered at Police Station Pragpura District Kotputli-Behror for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2) and 110 of BNS.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; that the injuries sustained by the injured are neither fatal nor dangerous to life. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long. He further submits investigation is complete and accused-petitioner is not required for further investigation. He
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-10379/2026] submits that accused-petitioner is not named in the FIR and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove and submits that there is one criminal antecedent registered against the accused-petitioner.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 08.06.2026; that the accused-petitioner is not named in the FIR; that the accused-petitioner is not required for further investigation; that the injuries sustained by the injured are neither fatal nor dangerous to life; that no test identification parade has been conducted and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Sanjay Yadav S/o Shri Shyam Sundar is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-10379/2026] transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in the concerned police station on 1st and 15th day of every month till the completion of trial.
7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court, Jail authorities and SHO through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 59/HEENA