CRLMB/8617/2026 of RAKESH S/O SANVALRAM Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 27 July 2026

1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 05.05.2026 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Niwai, District Tonk, in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.89/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.61/2026, Police Station Datvas, District Tonk for the offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 319(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 112(2), 61(2)(a) of the BNS, 2023, and Sections 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature in past. The total amount involved is approximately Rs.56,97,487/- has been credited in the account of co-accused Shankar Meena.

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-8617/2026]

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. Moreover, the challan in the case has already been filed and the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time and even the offences are triable by the Magistrate, therefore, he prays that the petitioners may be enlarged on bail as the accused are in custody since 10.04.2026.

4. Learned Additional Government Advocate vehemently opposes the bail application.

5. The Investigation Officer is present before this Court and submits that approximately amount of about Rs. 15,000/- to Rs. 20,000/- have been credited to the account of the petitioner.

6. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the material available on record.

7. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the submissions advanced, and particularly the fact that challan has been filed; all the offences are triable by Magistrate; the conclusion of trial is likely to take a considerable time; and measure amount has come into account one co-accused Shankar Meena; there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application deserves to be accepted.

7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely Rakesh S/o Sanvalram arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.61/2026, Police Station Datvas, District Tonk, shall be released on bail; provided he

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-8617/2026] furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court;

(ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which they are accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected;

(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and

(iv) In the event the petitioner is found involved in any other cyber fraud case in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 125/KRATIKA