Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/9201/2026 of ARYAN @ LUCKY SONI S/O SHRI AMAR CHAND SONI Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 24 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9201/2026 CNR: RJHC020564782026 | URN: CRLMB / 16844U / 2026 Aryan @ Lucky Soni S/o Shri Amar Chand Soni, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Shyam Mandir Ke Pass, Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar, Rajasthan. Presently
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9201/2026
CNR: RJHC020564782026 | URN: CRLMB / 16844U / 2026
Aryan @ Lucky Soni S/o Shri Amar Chand Soni, Aged About 21
Years, R/o Shyam Mandir Ke Pass, Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar, Rajasthan. Presently Residing At House No. 48, Kardhani Enclave, Hanuman Vatika, Gokulpura, Jaipur (Presently Confined At Central Jail Jaipur)
----Petitioner/Accused
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Rajendra Singh Raghav
For State
For Complainant
:
:
Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP
Mr. Vikas Singh Chouhan
Mr. Manish Soni, complainant
(present in person)
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
24/07/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed against the order of the learned trial Court dated 08.06.2026 on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 95/2026 registered at Police Station Manak Chowk, District Jaipur City (North) for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 318(4), 316(2) and 61(2) of BNS.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long; that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; that an amicable settlement has been arrived between the parties; that due amount has been
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-9201/2026] re-paid to the complainant and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove but did not dispute the fact that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner. Complainant-Manish Soni is present in person before this Court along with his counsel and submits the settlement letter, the same is taken on record. He further submits that he has no objection if the bail application is allowed.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and material available on record. Keeping in view the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 01.06.2026; that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; that an amicable settlement has been arrived between the parties; that due amount is paid by the accused-petitioner to the complainant; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Aryan @ Lucky Soni S/o Shri Amar Chand Soni is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-9201/2026] of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail.
7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court and Jail Authorities through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 126/KAVISH