Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/10011/2026 of KAYAM @ KAYYUM S/O SHAKOOR Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 24 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10011/2026 CNR: RJHC020600512026 | URN: CRLMB / 18591U / 2026 Kayam @ Kayyum S/o Shakoor, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Luhesar, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg. (At Present In Sub Jail, Kaman, Distt. Deeg).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10011/2026

CNR: RJHC020600512026 | URN: CRLMB / 18591U / 2026

Kayam @ Kayyum S/o Shakoor, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Luhesar, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg.

(At Present In Sub Jail, Kaman, Distt. Deeg).

---Accused-Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Vikram Singh Chauhan

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Shreeram Dhakad, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA

Judgment / Order

24/07/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 27.05.2026 passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Kama District Deeg, in Criminal Misc. Case (CIS) No.746/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.21/2015, Police Station-Kama, District-Bharatpur for the offences under Section 324 & 394 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 04.05.2026. He further submits that the challan in the case has already been filed, offences are triable by Magistrate, and the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time. He further submits that there are four criminal case reported to be pending against the petitioner and that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any stringent condition that may be

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-10011/2026] imposed by this Court. Therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the present bail application.

4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

5. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 04.05.2026; offences are triable by Magistrate; the challan has been filed; trial will take considerable time and further considering that the injuries are simple in nature and looking to the fact that pendecy of cases, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted subject to imposition of stringent conditions.

6. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely-Kayam @ Kayyum S/o Shakoor arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.21/2015, Police Station-Kama, District-Bharatpur, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court;

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-10011/2026]

(ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected;

(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and

(iv) In the event the petitioner is found involved in any other case of similar nature in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein.

(v) The accused-petitioner shall mark his presence before the concerned police station once in a month as fixed by the Investigating Officer and a register shall be maintained for the same by Investigating Officer.

(vi) In case of any change of residential address, the accused-petitioner shall immediately inform the Investigating Officer as well as the trial Court. (BIPIN GUPTA),J Sudha/47

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead