Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/10335/2026 of MOHD. AALAM S/O SHRI NABED Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 24 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10335/2026 CNR: RJHC020611832026 | URN: CRLMB / 19147U / 2026 1. Mohd. Aalam S/o Shri Nabed, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Turkmaan Gate, Super Colony, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, Police Station Kotwali, District
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10335/2026
CNR: RJHC020611832026 | URN: CRLMB / 19147U / 2026
1.
Mohd. Aalam S/o Shri Nabed, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Turkmaan Gate, Super Colony, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, Police Station Kotwali, District Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh. (At Present Confined At District Jail Kotputli).
2.
Mohd. Aabid S/o Shri Shahid, Aged About 38 Years, R/o House No. 59, Govindnagar, Turkmaan Gate, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, Police Station Kotwali, District Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh. (At Present Confined At District Jail Kotputli).
----Accused-Petitioners
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Manish Kumar Meena
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
24/07/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed against the order of learned Trial Court dated 29.06.2026 on behalf of the accused- petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 0222/2026 registered at Police Station Pragpura, District Kotputli- Behror for the offence(s) punishable under Section 303(2) of B.N.S., 2023.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case on the basis of sole statement of co-accused Manoj Kumar. He also submits that the accused-petitioners are in custody since long and
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-10335/2026] the alleged offence is triable by Magistrate. He further submits that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioners; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused- petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused- petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the accused- petitioners hereinabove but concurs with the fact that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioners.
4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record and the contentions put forth by learned counsel for both the parties; that the accused- petitioners are in custody since 11.06.2026; that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; that nothing has been recovered at the instance of the accused-petitioners; that investigation is complete and the accused-petitioners are not required for further investigation; that the main allegation is against the co-accused Manoj Kumar and the accused-petitioners have been implicated in this case on the sole statement of co- accused Manoj Kumar; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioners; that the trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.
5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners Mohd.
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-10335/2026] Aalam S/o Shri Nabed & Mohd. Aabid S/o Shri Shahid are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any offence(s) during currency of the bail.
7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned Trial Court and Jail authorities through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J PUNEET KUMAR/60