Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/11593/2026 of JEEVAN SINGH @ GAJRAJ SINGH @ GAJA S/O GUMAN SINGH Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 24 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11593/2026 CNR: RJHC020695992026 | URN: CRLMB / 21388U / 2026 Jeevan Singh @ Gajraj Singh @ Gaja S/o Guman Singh, Age About 34 Year, R/o Khetakheda, Police Station Bhawanimandi, Distt. Jhalawar. (Raj.)
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11593/2026
CNR: RJHC020695992026 | URN: CRLMB / 21388U / 2026
Jeevan Singh @ Gajraj Singh @ Gaja S/o Guman Singh, Age About 34 Year, R/o Khetakheda, Police Station Bhawanimandi, Distt. Jhalawar. (Raj.) (Petitioner Is In Sub Jail Bhawanimandi).
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Ali Mohammed Khan
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
24/07/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed against the order of the learned trial Court dated 17.07.2026 on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 191/2026 registered at Police Station Bhawani Mandi, District Jhalawar, for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 8, 15 and 29 of NDPS ACT.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case on the basis of disclosure statement of co-accused; that the accused- petitioner is in custody since long. He also submits that co- accused from whose possession contraband was recovered have already been enlarged on bail. He further submits that accused- petitioner is not required for further investigation and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-11593/2026] served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove but concurs with the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 14.07.2026; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner; that co-accused Avtar Singh, Yudhveer Singh, Hatey Singh and Gulab Singh from whose possession contraband was recovered have already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 04.06.2026 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.8101/2026 and 8239/2026 by this Court; that quantity of recovered contraband is below commercial quantity; that petitioner is not required for further investigation and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Jeevan Singh @ Gajraj Singh @ Gaja S/o Guman Singh is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-11593/2026] transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any offence(s) during currency of the bail.
7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court and Jail authorities through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 93/HEENA