Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/7457/2026 of BALKISHAN JANGID S/O RAMESHWAR Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 24 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7457/2026 CNR: RJHC020449472026 | URN: CRLMB / 13580U / 2026 1. Balkishan Jangid S/o Rameshwar, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Village Sali, Tehsil Dudu, District Jaipur Gramin, Rajasthan. 2. Manish Sharma S/o

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7457/2026

CNR: RJHC020449472026 | URN: CRLMB / 13580U / 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Balkishan Jangid S/o Rameshwar, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Village Sali, Tehsil Dudu, District Jaipur Gramin, Rajasthan.

2. Manish Sharma S/o Late Shri Ramprasad Sharma, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Rampura, Tehsil Rupangarh, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aman Choudhary Mr. Abhishek Dadhich For State For Respondent(s) : : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P., Ms. Priyanka, Addl. S.P. Women Investigation, Ajmer Mr. Mahesh Gurjar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 24/07/2026

1. The present criminal miscellaneous bail application has been preferred by the accused-petitioners under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, apprehending their arrest in connection with FIR No. 258/2025, registered at Police Station-Gandhi Nagar, District- Ajmer, for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 61(2), 111(2)(b) of the BNS and Section 3/21 & 5/21 of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Scheme Act, 2019.

2. Vide order dated 03.07.2026, the petitioner was permitted to appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation.

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-7457/2026]

3. In pursuance of the said order, the petitioners were interrogated by the Investigation Officer, who is present in person today. The Investigation Officer submits that she has verified the factum of compromise being entered into between parties. She further submits that the present petitioners are not required any further for any custodial interrogation.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail application.

5. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, and taking into consideration the submissions made at the Bar i.e. the petitioners have duly appeared before the Investigation Officer and has joined the interrogation and further, as per the submission of the Investigating Officer that the petitioners are not required for custodial interrogation on account of verification of the compromise, this Court deems it appropriate to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail.

6. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application filed by the accused-petitioners under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, is allowed. It is directed that, in the event of the arrest of the accused-petitioners i.e., (i) Balkishan Jangid S/o Rameshwar and (ii) Manish Sharma S/o Late Shri Ramprasad Sharma, in connection with FIR No. 258/2025, registered at Police Station- Gandhi Nagar, District-Ajmer, shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) along with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each, to

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-7457/2026] the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer/Station House Officer, subject to the following conditions:

(i) The accused-petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer as and when required and shall cooperate with the investigation;

(ii) The accused-petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat, or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing those facts to the Court or to any Police Officer;

(iii) The accused-petitioners shall not leave India without the prior permission of the concerned Court; and

(iv) The accused-petitioners are further directed not to take undue advantage of the liberty granted to them or misuse the same. It is made clear that any observations made by this Court in the present bail application are only for the purpose of deciding the instant application and shall not influence or affect the merits of the case during the course of trial. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 91/KRATIKA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead