Rajasthan High Court
/10790/2026 of CHANDRABHAN S/O SHRI BANWARI LAL Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 23 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10790/2026 CNR: RJHC020643652026 | URN: CRLMB / 19984U / 2026 Chandrabhan S/o Shri Banwari Lal, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Chak 05 LSM Banda, Police Station Anupgarh, District Shri Ganganagar, Rajasthan.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10790/2026
CNR: RJHC020643652026 | URN: CRLMB / 19984U / 2026
Chandrabhan S/o Shri Banwari Lal, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Chak 05 LSM Banda, Police Station Anupgarh, District Shri Ganganagar, Rajasthan. (Presently Languishing In Central Jail, Jaipur).
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
The State of Rajasthan, Through P.P
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Jai Kishan Yogi
Mr. Vishnu Kumar
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
23/07/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed against the order of the learned trial Court dated 30.06.2026 on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 517/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali Ganganagar, District Ganga Nagar for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 318(4), 178, 179, 180 and 182(1) of BNS.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; that charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused- petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-10790/2026] petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove and further submits that fake currency has been recovered from the accused-petitioner. He also submits that there are three criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and material available on record. Keeping in view the fact that the charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner has already been filed; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 29.11.2025 and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Chandrabhan S/o Shri Banwari Lal is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-10790/2026] mark his presence on 25th of every month in the concerned police station till the completion of trial of this case.
7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court and Jail Authorities through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 71/KAVISH