Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/10861/2026 of SURAJMAL S/O RATANLAL Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 23 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10861/2026 CNR: RJHC020653842026 | URN: CRLMB / 20104U / 2026 Surajmal S/o Ratanlal, aged 30 years, resident of Mundiya, Police Station Niwai Sadar, District Tonk Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus State Of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10861/2026
CNR: RJHC020653842026 | URN: CRLMB / 20104U / 2026
Surajmal S/o Ratanlal, aged 30 years, resident of Mundiya, Police Station Niwai Sadar, District Tonk Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Sushil Pujari
Mr. Jagdish Prasad Gujar
Mr. Urmila Devi Choudhary
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA
Judgment / Order
23/07/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 06.07.2026 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Malpura, District Tonk, in Bail Application No.116/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.29/2026, Police Station-Mor, District Tonk for the offences under Sections 303(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 345(3) of BNS of 2023 and Section 4/21 MMDR Act.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the vehicle in which he was transporting sand was found to be carrying sand in excess of the quantity mentioned in the E-Ravana. It is further alleged that the vehicle was bearing a different number plate.
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-10861/2026]
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is merely the driver of the truck, which was entrusted to him by its owner for driving.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents involving any offence of a similar nature or any other offence in past. It is also submitted that the conclusion of the investigation/trial is likely to take a considerable amount of time. Since the offences are triable by a Magistrate and the petitioner has remained in judicial custody since 29.06.2026, it is prayed that the petitioner be enlarged on bail.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.
6. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
7. Without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case and upon consideration of the arguments advanced that there are no criminal antecedents of having committed any offence of similar in nature or any other nature against the petitioner; investigation/trial will take sufficiently long time; offence are triable by magistrate, therefore, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.
8. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner - Surajmal S/o Ratanlal arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.29/2026, Police Station-Mor, District Tonk, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-10861/2026] Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till the completion of the trial and with additional following conditions:
(i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court;
(ii) The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; and
(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 56/JUBIN