Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/6703/2026 of RAVI SONI S/O SHRI KRISHAN KUMAR Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 23 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6703/2026 CNR: RJHC020407912026 | URN: CRLMB / 12112U / 2026 Ravi Soni S/o Shri Krishan Kumar, Age 26 Years, R/o Simla Police Station Mehada, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6703/2026
CNR: RJHC020407912026 | URN: CRLMB / 12112U / 2026
Ravi Soni S/o Shri Krishan Kumar, Age 26 Years, R/o Simla Police Station Mehada, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Behror).
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through Its P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Vinay Pal Yadav
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
23/07/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed against the order of learned Trial Court dated 09.04.2026 on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 198/2025 registered at Police Station Shahajahanpur, District Kotputli-Behror for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 305(a) & 331(4) of B.N.S., 2023.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the charge-sheet has already been filed; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-6703/2026]
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove and submits that several criminal antecedents are registered against the accused-petitioner, therefore, the accused-petitioner may not be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 BNSS.
4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record and the contentions put forth by learned counsel for both the parties; that the accused- petitioner is in custody since 22.01.2026; that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; that the charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner has been filed and the accused-petitioner is not required for further investigation; that the trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Ravi Soni S/o Shri Krishan Kumar is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-6703/2026] mark his presence on 25th of every month in the concerned police station till the completion of trial of this case.
7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned Trial Court and Jail authorities through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J PUNEET KUMAR/20