CRLMB/10730/2026 of MUFED S/O FASULA Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 23 July 2026

1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 01.07.2026 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kama, District Deeg, in Criminal Misc. Case (CIS) No.894/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.64/2014, Police Station-Jurhera, District-Deeg for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 307 IPC, 16/54 Excise Act and 3/25 Arms Act.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR was lodged in 2014. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he was not absconding in any manner. He further submits that other co-accused namely Sakir, Sharif and others have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-10730/2026]

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that there are no criminal antecedents of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature in past against the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is on no lessor footing then that of the co-accused Sakir who has been enlarged on bail on 31.05.2024. Moreover, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail as the accused is in custody since 24.05.2026.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.

5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case and upon consideration of the arguments advanced that the case of the petitioner is on no lessor footing than that of the co-accused Sakir who has already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 31.05.2024, there are no criminal antecedents of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature in past against the petitioner, trial will take sufficiently long time; challan has already been filed , therefore, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.

7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner-Mufed S/o Fasula arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.107/2026, Police Station-Kaithwara, District Deeg, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-10730/2026] sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till the completion of the trial and with additional following conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court;

(ii) The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected;

(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 54/JUBIN