Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/11458/2026 of PURUSHOTTAM S/O RAMNATH ADOPTED S/O JAGANNATH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 23 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11458/2026 CNR: RJHC020686542026 | URN: CRLMB / 21148U / 2026 Purushottam S/o Ramnath Adopted S/o Jagannath, R/o Kotdi Patheda, Police Station Sadar, Baran, District Baran (Raj.) ( At Present Confined In
[2026:RJ-JP:28359]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11458/2026
CNR: RJHC020686542026 | URN: CRLMB / 21148U / 2026
Purushottam S/o Ramnath Adopted S/o Jagannath, R/o Kotdi Patheda, Police Station Sadar, Baran, District Baran (Raj.) ( At Present Confined In District Jail Baran)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Ms. Sarah Saurabh Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
23/07/2026
1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner after arguing at some length made a limited prayer that the trial Court may be directed to expedite the trial as the accused-petitioner is in custody since 19.09.2025 and till date, not even a single witness has been examined.
2. Having considered the fact that the accused petitioner is in custody since 19.09.2025 and submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that not even a single witness has been examined so far, this Court deems it just and proper to direct the trial Court to expedite the trial proceedings of the case.
3. Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed.
4. The petitioner would be at liberty to move a fresh bail application after examination of the injured and the eye- witnesses. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 5/ Ravindra