Rajasthan High Court
CRLAS/1239/2026 of ARJUN MEENA SON OF ALOP SINGH @ ALOP SINGH @ ALOPI Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 23 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1239/2026 CNR: RJHC020522672026 | URN: CRLAS / 2235U / 2026 Arjun Meena Son Of Alop Singh @ Alop Singh @ Alopi, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Maderu, Police Station Todabhim, District Karauli (Raj.) (At Present Appellant
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1239/2026
CNR: RJHC020522672026 | URN: CRLAS / 2235U / 2026
Arjun Meena Son Of Alop Singh @ Alop Singh @ Alopi, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Maderu, Police Station Todabhim, District Karauli (Raj.) (At Present Appellant is Confined in District Jail Sawai Madhopur)
----Accused-Appellant
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor.
2.
Robin Kumar Meena Son Of Shri Narender Kumar Meena, Aged About 17 Years, Resident Of Naya Gaanv, Police Station Piloda, At Present Kela Devi Colony, Saloda, Gangapurcity, Police Station Udaimod, District Sawai Madhopur, minor through natural guardian Shri Narendra Kumar Meena Son Of Shri Bharat Lal Meena, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Naya Gaanv, Police Station Piloda, At Present Kela Devi Colony, Saloda, Gangapurcity, Police Station Udaimod, District Sawai Madhopur.
----Respondents
For Appellant(s)
:
Mr. Abdul Rahim Khan
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
23/07/2026
1. This criminal appeal has been filed on behalf of the accused- appellant under Section 14(A) of S.C./S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, in connection with FIR No. 0164/2025 registered at Police Station Udai Mod, District Sawai Madhopur(Raj.) for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 189(2), 137(2), 140(2), 140(3), 308(2), 115(2), 126(2), 352 and 351(3) of BNS.
(2 of 3) [CRLAS-1239/2026]
2. Learned counsel for the accused-appellant submits that the accused-appellant has been falsely implicated in this case; that charge-sheet has already been filed. He also submits that the accused-appellant is in custody since long. He further submits that the injuries sustained by the injured are neither fatal nor dangerous to life and trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-appellant in custody and, therefore, prays to enlarge the accused-appellant on bail.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the appeal and submits that there are two criminal antecedents against the accused-appellant.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the accused-appellant that the accused-appellant is behind the bars since 19.02.2026; charge-sheet against the accused-appellant has already been filed; that the injuries sustained by the injured are neither fatal nor dangerous to life and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without commenting anything on merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-appellant on bail.
5. Consequently, this instant appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 23.04.2026 passed by Special Judge, SC/ST Cases, Sawaimadhopur is set aside. It is ordered that the accused- appellant Arjun Meena Son Of Alop Singh @ Alop Singh @ Alopi be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/-
(3 of 3) [CRLAS-1239/2026] each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the following conditions:-
(i) The accused-appellant shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner.
(ii) The accused-appellant shall not indulge in any criminal activity, he shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the law and he shall mark his presence on 25th of every month in the concerned police station till the conclusion of trial.
(iii) The accused-appellant shall attend the hearing of the trial Court on the date fixed by the trial Court or as and when asked to appear before the trial Court.
(iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the accused-appellant shall be liable to be cancelled.
6. The observation made hereinabove is only for the decision of the instant criminal appeal and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court and Jail authorities through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 46/HEENA