Rajasthan High Court

SOSA/896/2026 of NAROTTAM S/O CHATURBHUJ @ RAMNATH, Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 23 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 896/2026 In D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 389/2024 CNR: RJHC020430162026 | URN: SOSA / 1705U / 2026 Narottam S/o Chaturbhuj @ Ramnath, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Moondli Bheruji, Police

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

D.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application (Appeal)

No. 896/2026

In

D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 389/2024

CNR: RJHC020430162026 | URN: SOSA / 1705U / 2026

Narottam S/o Chaturbhuj @ Ramnath, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Moondli Bheruji, Police Station Seeswali, District Baran (Raj.) (At Present Confined District Jail Baran)

----Accused-Appellant

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Rinesh Kumar Gupta with

Mr. Sarwat Alam

For Respondent(s)

For Complainant(s)

:

:

Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP

Mr. Mritunjya Sharma for

Mr. Samarth Sharma

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

23/07/2026 This suspension of sentence application under Section 430 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the accused-applicant (for brevity, “the applicant”) alongwith the appeal. The applicant has been convicted and sentenced by the learned District & Sessions Judge, Baran (for short, ‘the learned trial Court’) vide judgment dated 15.10.2024 passed in Sessions Case No.29/2023 CIS No.29/2023 as under:-

(2 of 3) [SOSA-896/2026]

1. Under Section 302 or 302/34 IPC: Life imprisonment and fine of Rs. 10,000/-; in default whereof, three months' additional imprisonment. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that similarly situated co-accused namely Monu and Rohit @ Tonu have already been granted benefit of suspension of their sentence by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 21.01.2026 and 30.04.2026 respectively and his case is not distinguishable from the case of those co-accused. He, therefore, prays that the suspension of sentence application be allowed. Per contra, though, learned Public Prosecutor, assisted by learned counsel for complainant, opposed the prayer; but, could not dispute that case of the applicant is not distinguishable from the case of co-accused, whose suspension of sentence applications have already been allowed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Heard. Considered. In view of the aforesaid undisputed position that case of the applicant is not distinguishable from the case of two co-accused person, who have already been extended the benefit of suspension of sentence by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, we deem it just and proper to extend the same benefit to the applicant on parity. Accordingly, the suspension of sentence application is allowed. Substantive sentence awarded to the applicant- Narottam S/o Chaturbhuj @ Ramnath by the learned trial Court vide judgment dated 15.10.2024 shall remain suspended during pendency of the appeal and he shall be released on bail provided he furnishes bail bonds to the satisfaction of the learned

(3 of 3) [SOSA-896/2026] trial Court to the effect that he shall appear before this Court on 24.08.2026 and as and when called upon to do so till disposal of the appeal and subject to the following conditions:-

1. That he will appear before the learned trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant changes the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed address to the learned trial Court as well as to his learned counsel in the High Court who shall, in turn, inform this Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(es), they will give in writing their changed address to the learned trial Court. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-applicant in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case relating to original case in which the accused- applicant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of the case in the learned trial Court. In case, the said accused-applicant does not appear before the learned trial Court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of benefit extended by this order. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J 16/RINCHU

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead