CRLMB/11440/2026 of SANJAY @ BACHIYA S/O GUGAN Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 23 July 2026

Order

23/07/2026

1. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner against the order dated 09.07.2026 passed by learned trial Court under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.269/2025 registered at Police Station Khairthal, District Khairthal-Tijara for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 112(2) & 140(2) of BNS, in which charge-sheet has been submitted under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 112(2), 140(2) & 309(6) of BNS.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case on the basis of disclosure statement of co-accused; that charge-sheet has already been filed. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long. He further submits that co-accused have been enlarged on bail and conclusion of trial will take its own time,

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-11440/2026] so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused- petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused- petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.

3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove and submits that there are criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner.

4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 19.05.2026; that accused-petitioner is not named in the FIR; that the injury sustained by the injured is not dangerous to life; that there is no injury on the vital part of the injured; that co-accused persons Sanjay Kumar Bhedi, Sandeep Kumar, Abhishek @ Deva and Sukhram @ Sukha have already been enlarged on bail vide orders dated 06.07.2026, 11.12.2025 and 16.10.2025 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application Nos. 6419/2026, 15829/2025, 12953/2025 and 13581/2025; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Sanjay @ Bachiya S/o Gugan is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-11440/2026] Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in the concerned police station on 1st and 15th day of every month till the completion of trial.

7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.

8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.

9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court and Jail authorities through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 76/HEENA