Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/8577/2026 of GOVIND BANSAL S/O SHRI MURLIDHAR GUPTA Vs UNION OF INDIA on 23 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 3rd Bail Application No. 8577/2026 CNR: RJHC020520422026 | URN: CRLMB / 15607U / 2026 Govind Bansal S/o Shri Murlidhar Gupta, Aged About 49 Years, R/o House No. 39, Krishna Nagar, Teen Dukaan, Sikar Road, Dhehar Ka Balaji,
[2026:RJ-JP:28343]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 3rd Bail Application No. 8577/2026
CNR: RJHC020520422026 | URN: CRLMB / 15607U / 2026
Govind Bansal S/o Shri Murlidhar Gupta, Aged About 49 Years, R/o House No. 39, Krishna Nagar, Teen Dukaan, Sikar Road, Dhehar Ka Balaji, Jaipur (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur, Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
Union Of India, Through Special PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Shreyansh Gupta
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Tej Prakash Sharma, Spl. PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
23/07/2026
1. Petitioner has filed this 3rd bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No. 16/2025, registered at N.C.B., Jaipur for offences punishable under Sections 8/21, 22 and 29 of the NDPS, Act.
2. The first bail application filed by the petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 30.01.2026. Thereafter, the second bail application No. 3603/2026, was dismissed by a detailed order dated 15.05.2026.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has failed to point out any material change in the circumstances subsequent to the rejection
[2026:RJ-JP:28343] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8577/2026] of the second bail application. Since, there is no material change circumstances after rejection of the second bail, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail.
7. Accordingly, this 3rd bail application is dismissed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J RAVINDRA /2