Rajasthan High Court

CW/1673/2025 of POONAM KUMARI D/O MANPHOOL SINGH W/O MANOJ KUMAR Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 23 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1673/2025 CNR: RJHC020077592025 | URN: CW / 4459U / 2025 Poonam Kumari D/o Manphool Singh W/o Manoj Kumar, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village Khajpura Purana, Post Khajpur Naya, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)

[2026:RJ-JP:28397]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1673/2025

CNR: RJHC020077592025 | URN: CW / 4459U / 2025

Poonam Kumari D/o Manphool Singh W/o Manoj Kumar, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village Khajpura Purana, Post Khajpur Naya, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunu (Raj.)

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

State of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Secondary Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)

2.

Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer (Raj.)

Through Its Secretary.

3.

Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan Bikaner (Raj.)

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mahala

For Respondent(s)

:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

23/07/2026 After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner made a limited prayer to this Court that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the Competent respondent-Authority regarding her grievances raised in the present writ petition. In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel, the present writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to the respondents/Competent Authority within a period of 30 days from today.

[2026:RJ-JP:28397] (2 of 2) [CW-1673/2025] In case, the respondent received any representation from the petitioner within above given time, the same may be considered and disposed of by a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and so also taking into consideration the present status of the recruitment under which the petitioner claiming her right. In case, the petitioner feels aggrieved by the decision of the respondents on the representation submitted by her, she would be at liberty to avail the remedy available to her under the law. The stay application as well as pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J YOGESH KUMAR/10

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead