Rajasthan High Court

CRLMB/8926/2026 of MAHENDRA SINGH S/O POONAM SINGH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 23 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8926/2026 CNR: RJHC020551432026 | URN: CRLMB / 16380U / 2026 Mahendra Singh S/o Poonam Singh, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Naya Gaon Saroth, Police Station Bar, District Beawar. (Presently Confined At District

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8926/2026

CNR: RJHC020551432026 | URN: CRLMB / 16380U / 2026

Mahendra Singh S/o Poonam Singh, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Naya Gaon Saroth, Police Station Bar, District Beawar. (Presently Confined At District Jail Beawar)

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Ms. Almas Khanan

Mr. Arpit Surana through VC

Mr. Shiv Kumar Sharma

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA

Judgment / Order

23/07/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 02.06.2026 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, No.1, District Beawar, in Bail Application No.57/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.135/2026, Police Station-Jawaja, District Beawar for the offences under Sections 19/54 Rajasthan Excise Act.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the co- accused namely Prem Shankar Singh has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 10.07.2026. He further submits that there only one another case of same year is pending for similar offence against the present petitioner.

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-8926/2026]

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the challan in the case has already been filed. Moreover, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time and even the offences are triable by a Magistrate, He further submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court, and accordingly prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail as the accused is in custody since 22.05.2026.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.

5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case and upon consideration of the arguments advanced that co-accused namely Prem Shankar Singh has already been enlarged on bail and further considering the fact that there is only one case reported to be pending against the petitioner of similar nature; trial will take sufficiently long time; offence are triable by magistrate, therefore, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted on stringent conditions.

7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner - Mahendra Singh S/o Poonam Singh arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.135/2026, Police Station-Jawaja, District Beawar, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-8926/2026] stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till the completion of the trial and with additional following conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court;

(ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected;

(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;

(iv) In the event the petitioner is found involved in any other similar offences in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned Trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted therein. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 27/JUBIN

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead