Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/8926/2026 of MAHENDRA SINGH S/O POONAM SINGH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 23 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8926/2026 CNR: RJHC020551432026 | URN: CRLMB / 16380U / 2026 Mahendra Singh S/o Poonam Singh, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Naya Gaon Saroth, Police Station Bar, District Beawar. (Presently Confined At District
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8926/2026
CNR: RJHC020551432026 | URN: CRLMB / 16380U / 2026
Mahendra Singh S/o Poonam Singh, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Naya Gaon Saroth, Police Station Bar, District Beawar. (Presently Confined At District Jail Beawar)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Ms. Almas Khanan
Mr. Arpit Surana through VC
Mr. Shiv Kumar Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA
Judgment / Order
23/07/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 02.06.2026 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, No.1, District Beawar, in Bail Application No.57/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.135/2026, Police Station-Jawaja, District Beawar for the offences under Sections 19/54 Rajasthan Excise Act.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the co- accused namely Prem Shankar Singh has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 10.07.2026. He further submits that there only one another case of same year is pending for similar offence against the present petitioner.
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-8926/2026]
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the challan in the case has already been filed. Moreover, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time and even the offences are triable by a Magistrate, He further submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court, and accordingly prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail as the accused is in custody since 22.05.2026.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.
5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case and upon consideration of the arguments advanced that co-accused namely Prem Shankar Singh has already been enlarged on bail and further considering the fact that there is only one case reported to be pending against the petitioner of similar nature; trial will take sufficiently long time; offence are triable by magistrate, therefore, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted on stringent conditions.
7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner - Mahendra Singh S/o Poonam Singh arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.135/2026, Police Station-Jawaja, District Beawar, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-8926/2026] stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till the completion of the trial and with additional following conditions:
(i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court;
(ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected;
(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;
(iv) In the event the petitioner is found involved in any other similar offences in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned Trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted therein. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 27/JUBIN