Rajasthan High Court

CW/519/2026 of DR. SURENDRA BALVEER SINGH CHOUDHARY S/O BALVEER SINGH CHOUDHARY Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 23 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 519/2026 CNR: RJHC020003922026 | URN: CW / 1105U / 2026 Dr. Surendra Balveer Singh Choudhary S/o Balveer Singh Choudhary, Aged About 37 Years, R/o 171- A , Bhagat Singh Colony, Jaipur Road, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner

[2026:RJ-JP:28340]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 519/2026

CNR: RJHC020003922026 | URN: CW / 1105U / 2026

Dr. Surendra Balveer Singh Choudhary S/o Balveer Singh Choudhary, Aged About 37 Years, R/o 171-A, Bhagat Singh Colony, Jaipur Road, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2.

Additional Director, Public Health, Medical And Health Services, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Swasthya Bhawan, C-Scheme, Ashok Nagar, Jaipur.

3.

Commissioner, Department Of Medical Education, Chikitsa Shiksha Bhawan, Near Pink Square Mall, Govind Marg, Jaipur.

4.

Office Of Chairman Dm/m.ch/md/ms Candidates Allotments Boards-2025, Sms Medical College, Jln Marg, Jaipur-302004.

5.

Principal And Controller, Govt. Medical College, Jhunjhunu.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Tarun Choudhary

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Yash Joshi for

Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

23/07/2026

1. Counsel for the petitioner, having instructions of petitioner, submits that in view of the fact that petitioner has joined his posting, the relief prayed for in the present writ petition has rendered infructuous. Therefore, petitioner does not want to press this writ petition.

2. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

3. Stay application and pending application, if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/ 2

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead