Rajasthan High Court

CRES/121/2025 of V. KRISHNAMURTHY S/O N.A. VIRUDHACHALA REDDIDAR, Vs THE AIRPORT DIRECTOR, JAIPUR AIRPORT, on 22 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 121/2025 URN: CRES / 307U / 2025 IN D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2097/2024 V. Krishnamurthy S/o N.a. Virudhachala Reddidar, Aged About 76 Years, Proprietor, M/s Meena Advertisers, New No. 66 (Old No. 142),

[2026:RJ-JP:28164-DB]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

D.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 121/2025

URN: CRES / 307U / 2025

IN

D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2097/2024

V. Krishnamurthy S/o N.a. Virudhachala Reddidar, Aged About 76

Years, Proprietor, M/s Meena Advertisers, New No. 66 (Old No.

142), Eldams Road, Tynampet, Chennai-18

----Applicant

Versus

1.

The Airport Director, Jaipur Airport, Airports Authority Of India, Jaipur Airport, Sanganer, Jaipur.

2.

The Chairman, Airport Authority Of India, Rajeev Gandhi Bhawan, Safdarganj Airport, New Delhi.

3.

The Airport Authority Of India, Through Its Chairman, Rajeev Gandhi Bhawan, Safdarganj Airport, New Delhi.

4.

Mr. Justice Sunil Ambawani (Retd), (Former Chief Justice Of Rajasthan High Court), The Sole Arbitrator, B-27, First Floor, Defence Colony, New Delhi-110024.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Ravi Bhojak, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

:

Ms. Sukriti Kasliwal, Adv.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

22/07/2026 In CMCC No. 1276/2025:

1. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 138 days in filing the restoration application is condoned.

2. Application stands disposed of.

[2026:RJ-JP:28164-DB] (2 of 2) [CRES-121/2025] In D.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 121/2025:

1. An application seeking restoration of the appeal was filed way back in February, 2025 and, despite ample opportunity, no reply has been filed to the same, notwithstanding that service of the same was effected sometime in November, 2025.

2. In view of the same, for the reasons stated in the application, which is duly accompanied with a sworn affidavit, the prayer for restoration of the appeal is allowed.

3. Accordingly, the present restoration application stands disposed of and D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2097/2024 is restored to its original number.

4. Record of learned Commercial Court be also requisitioned, by the Registry. Also, having seen the memo of parties, respondent No. 4, being not a necessary party, be struck of from the array of parties. Registry to take steps accordingly.

5. Appeal to come up on 18.08.2026. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J (ARUN MONGA),J 7/Mohita/Prashant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead