/7256/2026 of ALTAF S/O HARUN Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 22 July 2026

1. Altaf S/o Harun, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Nakatpur Po- lice Station Gopalgrah District, Deeg Rajasthan (At Present Sub Jail Deeg Raj.)

2. Imran S/o Harun, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Nakatpur Po- lice Station Gopalgarh District, Deeg Rajasthan (At Present Sub Jail Deeg Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. RB Sharma Ganthola Mr. RR Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 22/07/2026

1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 05.05.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kama, District-Deeg, in Criminal Misc. Case No. 634/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioners was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.65/2026, Police Station-Gopalgarh, for the offences under Section 303(2), 317(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 308(2), 61(2)(a) of the BNS, 2023, and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-7256/2026]

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners of having committed any offence of a similar nature or any other nature.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the challan in the case has already been filed and the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time and even the offences are triable by the Magistrate, therefore, he prays that the petitioners may be enlarged on bail as the accused-petitioners are in custody since 18.04.2026.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail applications.

5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners of having committed any offence of a similar nature or any other nature and the challan in the case has already been filed and the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time and even the offences are triable by the Magistrate, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioners deserves to be accepted.

7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely (i) Altaf S/o Harun and (ii) Imran S/o Harun, arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.65/2026, Police Station-Gopalgarh, shall be released on bail; provided they furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-7256/2026] they shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions:

(i) The petitioners shall not leave country without the permission of the Court;

(ii) The petitioners shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which they are accused, or suspected, of the commission of which they are suspected;

(iii) The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and

(iv) In the event the petitioners are found involved in any other cyber fraud case in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 13/JUBIN