Rajasthan High Court
CCP/207/2024 of NAGENDRA PAREEK SON OF SHRI BAJRANG LAL PAREEK Vs SHRI QUMMER UL ZAMAN CHOUDHARY on 22 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 207/2024 In D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL)No. 10640/2023 Nagendra Pareek Son Of Shri Bajrang Lal Pareek, Aged About 71 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 13, Rampura, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
[2024:RJ-JP:47444-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 207/2024
In
D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL)No. 10640/2023
Nagendra Pareek Son Of Shri Bajrang Lal Pareek, Aged About 71
Years, Resident Of Ward No. 13, Rampura, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1.Shri Qummer Ul Zaman Choudhary, District Collector Sikar (Raj.)
2. Shri Sudhansh Pant, Chief Secretary, Govt. of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. State of Rajasthan through Pr. Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Govt. of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Ajay Gupta with
Ms. Sampati Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Manoj Kumar,
Ms. Pooja Dixit for
Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
19/11/2024
1. This petition is filed pleading wilful disobedience of the directions of this Court dated 20.07.2023 passed in DBCWP No.10640/2023.
2. The operational part of the order is reproduced as below:- “In that view of the matter, the writ petition stands disposed off, in view of the directions issued by the Division Bench in the matter of Jagdish Prashad Meena (supra) and the
[2024:RJ-JP:47444-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-207/2024] petitioner is at liberty to make a representation before PLPC and the respondents are directed to decide the same within a period of three months.”
3. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that PLPC has taken up the matter in its meeting held on 24.07.2024 and considered the matter, though no formal order has been passed. The order on the representation of the petitioner shall be passed within three months from today.
4. In view of the statement made, the writ petition is disposed of.
5. Needless to say that the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law aggrieved of the decision of the PLPC.
6. It is clarified that in case the order is not passed and the statement made today in Court is not adhered by PLPC, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file an application for revival. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Mohita/Riya/36