Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/8877/2026 of RAVI KUMAR VERMA S/O SHRI OMPRAKASH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 21 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8877/2026 URN: CRLMB / 16269U / 2026 Ravi Kumar Verma S/o Shri Omprakash, Age 33 Years, R/o Ward No. 6 Mukhya Abadi Dehmi Kala, P.S. Bagru, Dist. Jaipur (Raj.) (Accused-Petitioner Confined In Central Jail,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8877/2026
URN: CRLMB / 16269U / 2026
Ravi Kumar Verma S/o Shri Omprakash, Age 33 Years, R/o Ward No. 6 Mukhya Abadi Dehmi Kala, P.S. Bagru, Dist. Jaipur (Raj.)
(Accused-Petitioner Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur).
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Jitendra Jain
For State
For Complainant
:
:
Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP
Mr. Kartar Singh
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
21/07/2026
1. This instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner against the order dated 29.05.2026 passed by learned trial Court under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.165/2026 registered at Police Station Bagru, District Jaipur (West) for the offence(s) under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 3(5) & 110 BNS.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that accused-petitioner is behind the bars since long; that charge-sheet has already been filed. He further submits that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused- petitioner; that injury sustained by the injured is not dangerous to life; conclusion of trial may take considerable time, so no fruitful
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-8877/2026] purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complianant vehemently opposed the contentions put forth by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner but did not dispute the fact that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner.
4. Heard and perused the material available on record; considering the facts and circumstances of the case and rival contentions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties; particularly keeping in view the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody 24.05.2026; that charge-sheet has already been filed; that main allegations are omnibus in nature; that injury sustained by the injured is not dangerous to life; that trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, this instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Ravi Kumar Verma S/o Shri Omprakash is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-8877/2026]
6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail.
7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court and Jail authorities through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 54/SHIVANI