Rajasthan High Court
CW/9088/2026 of SURESH CHAND SAINI S/O SHRI MOOL CHAND SAINI Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 21 July 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9088/2026 URN: CW / 20105U / 2026 Suresh Chand Saini S/o Shri Mool Chand Saini, Aged About 45 Years, 79, Gopal Vihar, Near Gopal Mahal Garden, Goner Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302031 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan,
[2026:RJ-JP:27998]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9088/2026
URN: CW / 20105U / 2026
Suresh Chand Saini S/o Shri Mool Chand Saini, Aged About 45
Years, 79, Gopal Vihar, Near Gopal Mahal Garden, Goner Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302031
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
2.
Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
3.
The Director, Medical , Health And Family- Welfare Department, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Dharmendra Jain
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Archit Bohra
Mr. Rahul Verma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
21/07/2026
1. At the request of learned counsel for the parties, present writ petition is considered for final disposal at this stage only.
2. While placing reliance upon the judgment in the case of Firoj Arif Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18268/2016) and connected matters decided by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 21.03.2017, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy raised herein is no more res-integra as the same has already been decided by this Hon'ble Court. He further referred the order dated
[2026:RJ-JP:27998] (2 of 2) [CW-9088/2026] 12.02.2014 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition Nos. 9583/2008, 9582/2008 and 9584/2008 decided by a Co-ordinate Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur and submits that the order as mentioned hereinabove is also approved by Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in the case of State of Rajasthan Vs. Dr. Paritosh Ujjwal on 09.07.2025.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents submits that the writ petition may be disposed of in light of the ratio laid down by this Hon'ble Court but a liberty may be granted to the Department that in case there is any factual difference about applicability of the aforesaid ratio then the Department will consider the same.
4. Having considered aforesaid, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the judgments in the case of Firoj Arif (supra) and Dr. Paritosh Ujjwal (supra); but in case there is any factual difference or any reason to deviate from the ratio exists, the respondents are at liberty to decide the same with a well-reasoned and speaking order after intimating the petitioner.
5. With aforesaid, the present writ petition stands disposed of with pending application(s), if any. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ravindra /109